• (613) 544-0211
  • Email
  • Map
  • Main
  • Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • People
  • Community
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Students
  • Employment

Cunningham Swan

Kingston Law Services

  • Construction Law
  • Environmental Law Practice Area
  • Energy Law Practice Area

Finding Solutions. Getting Results.

  • Business Law
  • Wills and Estates Law
  • Family Law
  • Litigation
  • Real Estate Law
  • Labour and Employment Law
  • Municipal Law
  • Construction Law
  • Land Use Planning & Development
  • Estate and Capacity Litigation
  • Environmental Law
  • Energy Law
  • Criminal Law and Regulatory Prosecutions

Lawyers

  • Alan Whyte *
  • Andrea Risk
  • Andrew Bonham
  • Andrew Sapiano
  • Angela Fallow
  • Angela Severson
  • Bob Little
  • Brian Gillingham
  • Carolyn Shelley
  • Claire Kadwell
  • Danielle Russell
  • David Adams
  • David Munday
  • Desiree Smith
  • Emma Cotman
  • Eric Bennett *
  • Greg Dobney
  • James L. McDonald
  • Kalen Ingram
  • Kurt Pearson
  • Lesley Kendall
  • Lisa Asbreuk *
  • Lisa Scheulderman
  • Mary-Alice Thompson *
  • Matt Benson
  • Matt Taft
  • Michael Brown
  • Robert (Bob) Tchegus
  • Robert Maratta
  • Ryan MacNeil
  • Sarah McCarthy
  • Silvia Cioci
  • Tony Fleming
Learn more about our students:
  • Articling Students
  • Summer Students
  • Students Testimonials
  • Frequently Asked Questions

Students

Cunningham Swan’s student programme aims to provide future lawyers with the opportunity to become involved in all practice areas and all aspects of legal work. The goal is to develop students into skilled and competent lawyers who will contribute to the firm’s growth.

Much Ado about Nothing The Milne Estate Revisited

Posted on January 30, 2019 by Angela Fallow

After several months of uncertainty potentially affecting thousands of wills in the province, the Divisional Court has confirmed that not only is the use of double wills acceptable, but there is no uncertainty that invalidates a will when “allocation clauses” are used in the definitions of the assets passing under each of two wills.

The expense incurred following the Milne Estate decision, which I blogged about in October [Blog Post] has been estimated at millions of dollars. Since late September of last year, Ontario lawyers have been working hard to identify clients whose multiple wills may be affected, but thanks to the favourable appeal decision, these efforts can be put to rest.

Justice Dunphy, in the lower court decision, found that a will is a trust and to be valid it must satisfy the three certainties: objects (beneficiaries), subject-matter (assets), and intent (to create a trust). He stated that because the Milne Estate assets flowing through the primary will were unclear to the estate trustees at the date of death, the requirement for certainty of subject-matter failed and the primary will was invalid.

Justice Dunphy also found that the allocation clause permitting the estate trustees to exclude certain assets from the primary will gave them too much discretion.

Justices Marrocco, Swinton,and Sachs heard the appeal. The Court confirmed that a will is not a trust and iterated that trusts may be created in a will, but a will does not necessarily create a trust; thus subject-matter certainty is not required to make a will valid.

It is not realistic or possible to state with certainty at the time the will is written which assets will be owned at death and require a Certificate of Appointment and which ones will not. Drafting lawyers include allocation clauses because these clauses permit estate trustees some discretion to determine after death which assets require a Certificate of Appointment and will flow through the primary will and which assets do not require a Certificate of Appointment and can pass through the secondary will.

Overturning Justice Dunphy’s finding, the Court held that “[t]he property in the Primary Wills can be clearly identified because there is an objective basis to ascertain it; namely whether a grant of authority by a court of competent jurisdiction is required for a transfer or realization of the property. As a result, the Estate trustees can allocate all the deceased person’s property between the Primary and Secondary wills on an objective basis.”

The Court confirmed that this does not give absolute discretion to the estate trustees. Estate trustees are beholden to various institutions to decide whether the institution requires probate for certain assets, so the discretion given to the estate trustees in allocation clauses is not arbitrary.

In summary, secondary wills remain an effective tool to mitigate probate tax payable, avoid delay and preserve privacy. The Dunphy decision unnecessarily created uncertainty and led to undue expense, as lawyers sought to respond responsibly on behalf of their clients, all to return to where we began.

This update is provided as a courtesy for your general information and does not constitute legal advice. Every organization is unique and may also be subject to other laws not contemplated in this update. This update should not be relied on as a substitute for legal advice which necessarily must be specific to your organization, your objects, your operations, and your structure. If you have any questions about this information please contact one of the lawyers listed above.


Related Areas

  • Wills and Estates Law

Related Lawyers

  • Angela Fallow

Search

© 2019 Cunningham, Swan, Carty, Little & Bonham LLP. All rights reserved. · Terms & Privacy · Site Design: Switchclick